Posts Tagged ‘transparency international’

17
January 2013

Russia’s Anti-Corruption Moves Draw Renewed Skepticism

Wall Street Journal

Is Russia finally getting serious about corruption?

Russia’s Interior Ministry has taken the rare step of spearheading a high-profile international investigation, charging a former member of the board of directors of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development with seeking a bribe from a company that wanted a loan.

Yelena Kotova, who sat on EBRD board from 2005 to the end of 2010 as a representative of Russia, Belarus and Tajikistan, denies the allegations.

Coming after the introduction of higher fines for bribery, more investigations, official jawboning on the issue and a higher ranking in the latest Transparency International data, does this signify the turning of a page?

It does not, according to two attorneys who work with companies in Russia.

“It’s good that the Russians are investigating corruption,” said Danforth Newcomb at Shearman & Sterling, but he said he hasn’t detected any significant improvement in the level of corruption there.

Likewise, Daniel Rothstein from a New York law firm with the same name, said his view, partly based on conversations with professional colleagues in Russia, is to “doubt there is a trend toward cleaning up private or public corruption.”

Both lawyers point out corruption investigations in Russia are often used for settling scores. “Unless you’re inside the case, it’s impossible to know the significance of any corruption investigation in Russia,” said Rothstein.

Read More →

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Tumblr
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • NewsVine
  • Digg
29
October 2012

Anti-Corruption Views – The rallying cry of an anti-corruption warrior

Trust Law

Launching a global anti-corruption movement is no mean achievement. When a band of evangelists founded Transparency International in 1993, Frank Vogl recalls they were scoffed at. The Economist magazine drew a cartoon depicting them as vainglorious Don Quixotes tilting at windmills. Bribery, like death and taxes, was viewed as unfortunate but a sin to largely tolerate.

Almost 20 years later, anti-corruption has moved to the centre of global policymaking. It was a driving force behind the Arab Spring, when protesters angered by poverty, lack of opportunity and pillaged national wealth overthrew dictatorial governments. It is discussed at meetings of G20 world leaders, enshrined in international conventions and in national legislation. Today there is a thriving lobby of specialists putting the squeeze on kleptocrats by exposing illicit money flows, revealing the revenues they pocket from oil, gas and mineral contracts and scrutinising how foreign direct aid is managed.

In this highly readable primer “Waging War on Corruption”, Frank Vogl, a former journalist and World Bank communications manager, describes how a band of former World Bank officials and lawyers angered by seeing development aid line the pockets of government and business elites, decided to do something about it. They rejected the idea that corruption is embedded in certain cultures and believed change can come from mobilising individuals. Today Transparency International has grown from its headquarters in Berlin to chapters in 90 countries around the world and is the leading voice in fighting corruption, its scoring of countries’ public sector in its Corruptions Perceptions Index followed as a benchmark. The simple but powerful idea was to hold government officials accountable, so that sunshine might have a sanitizing effect on behaviour.

The strength of Vogl’s book is in making clear the linkages between corruption and thwarted economic, political and social development; and between corruption and weakened international security. He tells a sweeping narrative of how the fall of the Berlin Wall inspired a new generation to rise up, and how the spread of communications technologies has further empowered the movement.

Read More →

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Tumblr
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • NewsVine
  • Digg
21
September 2012

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT TAKES A STANCE AGAINST ABUSE OF POWER IN RUSSIA

Transparency International

The European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee today threw its weight behind the campaign to bring those to account who are responsible for the death of anti-corruption hero Sergei Magnitsky.

The Committee has proposed an EU-wide visa ban and assets freeze for Russian officials involved in Magnitsky’s death, and in its cover-up. The Members of the European Parliament added a call to Russia to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation into this case. The Committee expects the Council to take on a more coeherent human rights policy.

In November 2009, Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky died in prison. He had been held in detention for almost a year, after alleging wide-spread and systematic corruption and theft by government officials. The ensuing outrage at the brutality and injustice of his treatment led to an international campaign to bring those responsible to account.

In 2011 Magnitsky’s mother collected Transparency International’s Integrity Award on his behalf during the 14th International Anti-Corruption Conference (IACC). For more details on the case listen to this podcast with Elena Panfilova, Board Member of Transparency International and Director of our Russian Chapter. займ на карту займ на карту https://zp-pdl.com/emergency-payday-loans.php https://zp-pdl.com/emergency-payday-loans.php hairy woman

кредит онлайн на карту долгий срок credit-n.ru онлайн кредит круглосуточно
быстрые кредиты с плохой кредитной историей credit-n.ru займ на карту сбербанка мгновенно
онлайн займ на киви кошелёк срочно credit-n.ru займ без процентов на карту мгновенно
онлайн займ на карту маэстро credit-n.ru займ онлайн на киви кошелек срочно

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Tumblr
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • NewsVine
  • Digg
23
May 2012

Civil society surges ahead of the authorities

Moscow News

Russia’s civil society has made a dramatic leap forward over the past three years and is doing much more to curb corruption than the authorities, Yelena Panfilova, a prominent, outgoing member of the presidential anti-corruption and human rights council, said on Wednesday.

“Russia today is not the same country it was when I joined the council three years ago; first of all, it’s about the society, not the authorities,” Panfilova, who heads Transparency International’s Russian branch, said at a news conference in Moscow marking the end of the council’s term under President Dmitry Medvedev.

Panfilova announced last week that she was not planning to continue her work with the council, which is expected to be reshuffled following the inauguration of Vladimir Putin on May 7. Several other council members also said they were going to resign.

Some observers have suggested it was their unwillingness to compromise with former KGB agent Putin that forced them to leave the council. But Panfilova downplayed the allegation on Wednesday, saying her departure was due to her desire to focus on civil activism rather than a falling out with the authorities.

Council members admitted that their success in promoting human rights and the rule of law in Russia was limited.

“We have done a small part of what we were planning to do,” Lyudmila Alexeyeva, who heads the Moscow Helsinki Group, said.

’No disappointment’

Yet, when asked by a Western reporter whether they were disappointed with a lack of progress in their work, council members said they were rather realistic and did not expect things to improve by leaps and bounds.

“To be disappointed, one must first be charmed,” Panfilova quipped, adding that this was not the case with her, since she realized that Russia still has a long way to go before its citizens can enjoy full human rights and social justice.

She admitted, however, that she was “embarrassed” with the strong opposition that many of the council’s initiatives faced from local officials who were reluctant to sacrifice their power in favor of a more open and just society.

Unresolved cases

Among the goals to be pursued by the newly formed council, Fedotov and his colleagues named the tightening of punishment for abuse of media freedom, the creation of public television, as well as better anti-corruption controls.

It is yet unclear how many of the council’s current initiatives will survive Putin’s return to the Kremlin. The issues in question include the high-profile cases of jailed ex-Yukos head Mikhail Khodorkovsky and anti-corruption lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, whose death in a Moscow pre-trial detention in November 2009 triggered international outcry.

“We couldn’t resolve the main problems with the Khodorkovsky and Magnitsky cases,” Mara Polyakova, a council member overseeing reforms in the legal and law enforcement systems, admitted.

Nevertheless, she said she believed the council’s campaign to highlight the Khodorkovsky case had a “major effect on our citizens.”

Khodorkovsky and his business partner Platon Lebedev were detained in 2003 on fraud charges and subsequently jailed for eight years. They had been due for release in 2011, but were found guilty on a second set of charges and their sentences extended until 2018 in a highly controversial trial in December 2010.

In early February, the council urged Medvedev to pardon Khodorkovsky along with 30 other prisoners. But Medvedev refused, saying he did not understand why he should pardon someone who had not asked for clemency.

Hermitage Capital lawyer Magnitsky’s death at Moscow’s infamous Matrosskaya Tishina pretrial detention center came to Medvedev’s attention last year, after the presidential council issued a report saying that his arrest was unlawful, his detention marked by beatings and torture aimed at extracting a confession of guilt, and that prison officials instructed doctors not to treat him. Two doctors have been charged with negligence in connection with the case, but charges were subsequently dropped against one of them.

Magnitsky was arrested in November 2008 on tax evasion charges by those same officers he had shortly before accused of stealing $230 million from the state budget.

New council ‘up to Putin’

Fedotov said it was up to Putin to ensure that the council does not “turn into window dressing.”

Fedotov said he would welcome any newcomers in the council if they share the same values as those whom they would replace.

“But if in the place of those great people we will have people who attack human rights rather than protect them… I will not be there,” he said. онлайн займы hairy girl https://zp-pdl.com/online-payday-loans-cash-advances.php https://zp-pdl.com/best-payday-loans.php payday loan

займ на карту мгновенно без отказа credit-n.ru займ на кредитную карту мгновенно
быстрый займ на карточку credit-n.ru займ на длительный срок онлайн
online кредит на карту credit-n.ru онлайн кредит без процентов на карту
быстрый кредит без проверок credit-n.ru кредит под 0 на карту

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Tumblr
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • NewsVine
  • Digg
08
May 2012

Kremlin Human Rights Watchdog’s New Master

International Policy Digest

By John K. Yi – May 5, 2012

The Council’s Final Meeting

In two days, Vladimir Putin will be inaugurated for this third term as the President of the Russian Federation. And with his reentry into the nation’s chief position, the issue of human rights and the development of civil society, a touted reform in the past four years under current President Medvedev, face an uncertain future.

Earlier this week President Medvedev’s held his final meeting with the Kremlin’s Council on the Development of Civil Society and Human Rights. With their terms expiring on Monday, the departing council members did not hold back their disappointment of the Council’s accomplishments and criticism of the Kremlin’s unwillingness to make true reform.

The Council Chairman Mikhail Fedotov opened the meeting by raising his concerns to the exiting President that the council, though it has helped passed a number of laws, has still a long way to go on issues of police and anti-corruption reform. He described the current government apparatus as “sufficiently bulky, archaic, and clumsy.” After the meeting in an interview with the press, Fedotov warned that if under President Putin the members of the Council were to be replaced by “generals” and “those who attack human rights,” he would have no interest in being part of such a Council.

Other prominent members of the Council made their own departing shots, when they announced that they would not be returning to their posts under the new administration.

Read More →

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Tumblr
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • NewsVine
  • Digg
02
May 2012

Human Rights Activists Quit Ahead of Putin’s Inauguration

RIA Novosti

Several of Russia’s leading human rights advocates plan to quit the presidential Human Rights Council after President-elect Vladimir Putin takes up his post on May 7, Russian media reported on Wednesday.

According to Vedomosti business daily, among those planning to leave the human rights body are the head of Transparency International Russia, Yelena Panfilova, a political analyst Dmitry Oreshkin and the head of the non-government organization of working refugees, Civil Cooperation, Svetlana Gannushkina.

Panfilova, who delivered a report on corruption at the last council meeting on Saturday, said that she remained in the council only because of the pledge she gave to the mother of Sergei Magnitsky, a lawyer who died in pre-trial detention in 2009, to investigate his death.

“I think I’ll do much more with my civil activity within my current job,” Panfilova said in an interview with Kommersant daily on Wednesday.

Another council member, political analyst Dmitry Oreshkin, made the decision to leave the body after his report on electoral violations which was rejected under the pretext of the president’s tight schedule.

Oreshkin told Vedomosti that he was going to deliver the facts showing up to 14 percent of ballot stuffing in Putin’s results during the March presidential elections where he secured a landslide victory which critics said was achieved through numerous violations.

“I regard Putin as an illegitimate president. I won’t be able to work in his council,” Vedomosti quoted Oreshkin as saying.

Gannushkina of human rights group Civil Assistance will also quit the council, Vedomosti said.
Veteran human rights activist Lyudmila Alekseeva however said that the human rights advocates should closely cooperate with the state authorities and not ignore them.

In December last year, amid mass street protest against alleged fraud in Russia’s parliamentary elections, a prominent human rights activist Irina Yasina and journalist Svetlana Sorokina left the Kremlin council on human rights over what they described as “falsifications” during the December 4 vote and “brutal reprisal” against pro-democracy protesters.

The presidential human rights council is known for its independent stance but it has no legal authority and had its recommendations ignored in the past. займы онлайн на карту срочно hairy girls https://zp-pdl.com https://zp-pdl.com/online-payday-loans-cash-advances.php hairy woman

быстрые кредиты с плохой кредитной историей credit-n.ru займ на карту сбербанка мгновенно
онлайн займ на киви кошелёк срочно credit-n.ru займ без процентов на карту мгновенно
онлайн займ на киви кошелёк credit-n.ru займы на яндекс деньги мгновенно
займ на карту мгновенно без отказа credit-n.ru займ на кредитную карту мгновенно

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Tumblr
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • NewsVine
  • Digg
16
March 2011

Russian Journalists Need Help in Exposing Corruption

Nieman Reports

Exposing corruption in countries where the rule of law has not been established is always a heavily one-sided affair. Independent media and the Internet are the tools that citizens have to fight against it while the ruling elite retains the power of the state’s resources and commands the loyalty of those who enforce punishment on those who interfere. Today in Russia journalists need help in their fight against corruption. We don’t want intrusive assistance, but rather moral and professional support from our international colleagues (journalists and bloggers) along with attentiveness on the part of international investors.

Read More →

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Tumblr
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • NewsVine
  • Digg
23
December 2010

Russia acknowledges it has an image problem

BBC News Online

Russia has an image problem due to cases such as the death in jail of a whistleblower and the trials of an ex-tycoon, a senior official has said.

But the president’s chief economic adviser added that Russia was working hard to improve the investment climate. “We are doing our best to punish those people who are not following the rule of law,” said Arkady Dvorkovich.

Read More →

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Tumblr
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • NewsVine
  • Digg
14
November 2010

Silence over Russian ‘martyr’; Lawyer’s family hope film will help win justice for man who died a year ago after fighting corruption

The Sunday Telegraph

14 November 2010 – In the eyes of his supporters, he was a martyr in the fight against corruption, who paid the ultimate price for exposing Russia’s biggest-ever tax scandal. In the eyes of the authorities, though, Sergei Magnitsky was a criminal suspect himself, whose death while awaiting trial in a “dungeon-like” prison merited no further investigation.

Now, exactly a year after he was found dead in a squalid jail cell, Mr Magnitsky’s mother and colleagues are to mount a challenge to the Kremlin’s silence with a documentary to be shown to British parliamentarians on Tuesday.

“So far nobody has explained what happened,” said Natalya Magnitskaya, his mother, who has accused the Russian judiciary of “destroying” her son. “I do not understand why this has happened to him. He always respected the law.”

Mr Magnitsky is believed to have uncovered one of the biggest tax frauds in Russian history, perpetrated by a gang of police officers who allegedly plundered the state’s coffers to the tune of £144million.

Those same policemen then turned on their accuser and jailed him, in what friends claim was an attempt to pressure him into denouncing one of his clients, an investor in Russia who had fallen out with the Kremlin.

In the event, Mr Magnitsky did not crack but his health did. He developed a severe pancreatic condition while being held in Butyrka prison, in Moscow, a notoriously spartan Tsarist-era jail that once held the writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Three hours after being transferred to another facility, he died aged just 37.

“They put him in dungeon-like conditions,” added Jamison Firestone, the boss at the law firm where Mr Magnitsky worked. “Cells without windows, humidity, they turned off his hot water, and the sewage.”

Since he died, Mr Magnitsky’s story has become a diplomatic flashpoint between Russia and its foreign partners. President Dmitry Medvedev has been forced to change the law to ensure that people charged with white-collar crimes are not jailed before they have even been tried.

Yet the official investigation into his death, which is still open, has gone nowhere. Nobody has been arrested or charged.

Instead, the police officers whom Mr Magnitsky believed defrauded the state, and then tried to cover it up by jailing him, were handed top government awards last week.

The awards were unrelated to the Magnitsky case and came after two of the officers involved in the case were promoted.

Mr Magnitsky’s former client William Browder, a London-based businessman who is chief executive of Hermitage Capital Management, said that the plaudits beggared belief. “They are circling the wagons and protecting their own,” he told The Sunday Telegraph.

“Every step the interior ministry takes to cover up their crimes is more cynical than the last. It never ceases to amaze me just how evil these people can be.”

Last Friday, Transparency International, an anti-graft organisation, posthumously awarded Mr Magnitsky its Integrity Award.

“He battled as a lone individual against the power of an entire state,” said Sion Assidon, chairman of the awards committee. “He believed in the rule of law and integrity, and died for his belief.”

Meanwhile Benjamin Cardin, an American senator, has drawn up a list of 60 individuals he believes were complicit in the lawyer’s death and is pushing for them to face visa bans and asset freezes in Western countries.

At least two of the accused police have hit back, arguing that they are innocent and have been targeted in a smear campaign to deflect attention from Mr Browder.

Mr Browder, 46, who was born in the US but has since become a British citizen, is a controversial figure in Russia. The grandson of Earl Browder, the former leader of the American Communist party, he made his fortune during the 1990s by investing money in privatisations during the post-Soviet era.

However, the firm has made a point of exposing corporate corruption in companies it buys into, in the hope of improving managerial behaviour and share prices.

Once a supporter of Vladimir Putin, the Russian prime minister, Mr Browder fell out of official favour after he started complaining about corporate governance in Russian energy giant Gazprom. He was denied a visa in 2005 and has been blacklisted as a threat to Rus-sia’s national security ever since.

In 2007, Russian police raided three of his offices carting off numerous documents. Baffled by the raids, he hired Mr Magnitsky to make inquiries.

The young lawyer quickly concluded that the policemen had used the company seals of two of the companies they had raided to steal the firms, and had then fraudulently demanded a tax refund to the tune of $230million (£143million). Mr Browder said he told all his lawyers, including Mr Magnitsky, to tread carefully.

“They started opening criminal cases against all our lawyers,” he says in the documentary about the affair. “I said: ‘Whatever is going on here, whatever you are doing, it is best to get out of harm’s way’.”

Mr Magnitsky was apparently unfazed and even testified against the police officers he believed had perpetrated the fraud.

It was a courageous act his family was later to regret. His mother said medicine she sent him for a stomach complaint was often held up, and that he was isolated.

He was repeatedly asked to denounce Mr Browder, who denies Russian accusations of tax evasion. Mr Magnitsky said he was only interested in denouncing the police officers he believed were corrupt.

His mother only learned of his death when she turned up at the prison gates to give him a parcel. “At first I didn’t believe it and thought they must be joking,” she recalled “My son was 37. He was full of energy and he was healthy.” “They put him in dungeon-like conditions. Cells without windows, they turned off his hot water займы на карту срочно микрозаймы онлайн https://zp-pdl.com/emergency-payday-loans.php https://www.zp-pdl.com hairy woman

online кредит на карту credit-n.ru онлайн кредит без процентов на карту
онлайн кредит на карту круглосуточно credit-n.ru займы которые дают абсолютно всем на карту круглосуточно
быстрый займ на киви кошелек credit-n.ru займ онлайн круглосуточно на банковскую карту
кредит срочно на карту без отказа credit-n.ru экспресс займ онлайн заявка

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Tumblr
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • NewsVine
  • Digg